<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Typhoon HIL Forum - Recent questions and answers in Model partitioning</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=qa/model-partitioning</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Answered: How to distribute burden on two CPUs (user and system) to address the CIO indication?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=386/how-distribute-burden-cpus-user-system-address-indication&amp;show=387#a387</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Nishan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are using the power loss calculation toolbox to calculate losses then switching losses can be estimated. This &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://ticket.typhoon-hil.com/kb/faq.php?id=213&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; might be useful for getting a better understanding of how it works.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there any reason you are using such a small time step for the loss calculation? Usually there is no need for the time step to be equal to the switching period and a less demanding time step is chosen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Luka&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=386/how-distribute-burden-cpus-user-system-address-indication&amp;show=387#a387</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Answered: Is it possible to adjust the size of a core coupling element?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=312/is-it-possible-to-adjust-the-size-of-a-core-coupling-element&amp;show=314#a314</link>
<description>Hi Ioannis,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are right that the coupling elements size is not adjustable as of now.&lt;br /&gt;
However, you can use an alternative approach to place the block in a subsystem component as the size for subsystem block can be adjusted as required. This will in turn help you to create a less complicated model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope this helps!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best Regards.</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=312/is-it-possible-to-adjust-the-size-of-a-core-coupling-element&amp;show=314#a314</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Answered: Is there any way to use 2 Three phase inverter with Three Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (Open Winding)?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=307/there-inverter-permanent-magnet-synchronous-machine-winding&amp;show=308#a308</link>
<description>Hi JunHwan,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you mentioned your are using HIL402 device with configurations 5, which basically provides 2 cores for running converters and since one core can run a maximum weight of 3, you have sufficient core available to run both inverters. However, since 2 converters will use 2 cores, without core-coupling, you cannot compile the model since the processor is trying to run both converters on a single core. Hence, I recommend you to kindly use core coupling in the model preferably at a suitable point between the converters.&lt;br /&gt;
I also would suggest, since there is only a single machine block in your model, you can try to use configuration 1 of HIL402 also. With addition of core-coupling, your model will compile in configuration 1 as well.&lt;br /&gt;
In case, you still face any errors, try to share relevant files of the model, if possible, for better understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best Regards.</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=307/there-inverter-permanent-magnet-synchronous-machine-winding&amp;show=308#a308</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>